Monday, August 02, 2010

WikiLeaks Scandal Tied To Gay Rage?

If so, this will not help the cause of those fighting for homosexuals to be allowed to serve openly in the armed services. Nor will it give any confidence to those already questioning Obama's competence as the Commander-in-Chief of our armed services. Via Environmental Republican, we get this report:

The British Telegraph newspaper is reporting that the American soldier at the center of the scandal was “openly homosexual” and apparently held a grudge against the U.S. because of the military’s anti-gay policy.

In another bizarre twist, reliable reports suggest that Private First Class Bradley Manning, the U.S. Army Intelligence analyst accused of leaking the classified information to the website, was not only a homosexual but was considering a sex change. Manning was arrested at the end of May and is being detained by U.S. authorities.

It is apparent that Manning, based on published reports, was a public homosexual activist for at least over a year. During this time he apparently came up with the idea of downloading and releasing the classified information to WikiLeaks as a way to get back at the United States military over its policy regarding homosexuality.

Why does this report have credence? Because it fits the Obama/Liberal M.O. to a f*cking "T":

The riveting Telegraph account of Manning’s growing rage and anger raises serious questions of how the soldier was able to flaunt his homosexuality despite the fact that the Pentagon still officially has a policy in place of excluding open homosexuals from military service.

In a clear indication that the law was being ignored by the Obama Administration, the evidence demonstrates that Manning was continuing to serve after openly flaunting his homosexuality, including on Facebook.

Who in the Obama Administration—and the Department of Defense—was aware of his conduct and looked the other way? Was Manning given a pass because his “lifestyle” was considered to be in favor and acceptable under the Obama Administration?

The revelations of Manning’s openly pro-homosexual conduct suggest that a more liberal Department of Defense policy, in deference to the wishes of the Commander-in-Chief, had already been in effect and has now backfired in a big way.

If you can't change the law, break the law. Or turn a blind eye towards lawbreakers if they are members of your voting coalition. That's the Obama way, that's the Democrat's way...and now some of our bravest young Americans - those who volunteer to go into combat - are going to die so that hardcore liberal ideology can thrive.

But that's the Democrat's way, too....

No comments: