Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Anita Dunn Lies, The "Women's Movement" Hides, Abuse Continues Unabated...

Ron Suskind's new book Confidence Men: Wall Street, Washington and the Education of a President, is causing waves for many reason, one of which is the many first-hand accounts of the poor treatment  afforded to female members of the Obama team. (I've written so often about the misogyny of the liberals and the Democratic party I've gotten bored with the topic, but you can read some posts here and here and here and here and here....).

Fearless Anita Dunn - she of the Mao Fan Club - provides the most damning accusation:

One of the most striking quotes in the book came from former White House communications director Anita Dunn , who was quoted as saying that, “this place would be in court for a hostile workplace. . . . Because it actually fit all of the classic legal requirements for a genuinely hostile workplace to women.”

But hold on! When questioned about the quote, Dunn denied ever saying it!

Dunn says she was quoted out of context and told The Post on Friday that she told Suskind “point blank” that the White House was not a hostile work environment.

Oh, really? Turns out Suskind recorded the coversation, which he shared with the Washington Post:

On Monday, Suskind allowed a Post reporter to review a recorded excerpt of the original interview, which took place over the telephone in April. In that conversation, Dunn is heard telling Suskind about a conversation she had with Jarrett.

“I remember once I told Valerie that, I said if it weren’t for the president, this place would be in court for a hostile workplace,” Dunn is heard telling Suskind. “Because it actually fit all of the classic legal requirements for a genuinely hostile workplace to women.”


Bill Clinton used women as the equivalent of blow-up sex toys, Barack Obama uses women as props, stagecraft, to be seen and not heard.  And those women's groups, so prickly and quick to jump upon any perceived slights to the gender?

Nothin' but crickets.  Remember that the next time they shriek in rage at some trumped up charge against an innocent Republican...

But still - women consistently vote for Democrats over Republicans, despite the fact that the Dems  treat them  no better than a sleazy one-night bar stand, whispering sweet nothings into their ears as they take everything they have, and leave chuckling, never fulfilling that promise to call, and studiously ignoring them should they randomly meet again.

Is it true that women just like men who treat them poorly?  Or are women just the electoral equal to the Jews, constantly voting out of guilt for a party that treats them like shit?  When you take into account that women like Dunn lie to cover up their mistreatment at the hands of the Left, one wonders if they aren't suffering from the same "battered wife syndrome" the Jews are...

No comments: