Anyway - here is MSNBC host Krystal Ball giving it her intellectual all on the Jovan Belcher murder-suicide (video at the link):
“I think the NRA, the gun owners of America go too far in opposing any kind of restriction on gun rights, you know, they think you should be able to own anything in any number and carry it in any place at any time and that I disagree with but I would say let’s leave the Constitution out of this as that’s a complicated issue as well.”
Yeah, Krystal, that Second Amendment is really, really complicated:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
Read those last four words, Krystal, and tell me what you're having problem understanding. OK?
Sigh...and this is what passes for reasoned discourse on the Left. Or is it just a desperate attempt by a last-place network to titillate viewers with a sexy ex-candidate possessing a naughty moniker?
This is her now:
...only a slightly-better dressed version of the party girl whose campaign was derailed by this photo-shoot:
She claimed sexism, of course without really explaining why. She still lost. But that was back in 2010. Given the degraded state of the electorate since then, had she run this past November, she would have won in a landslide, with insurmountable margins from America's new elite - single horny woman and drunken frat boys...
1 comment:
The second amendment is real simple if you disregard all but the last 4 words. Taken in it's entirety and considering the situation in which the founding fathers wrote it (original intent) and such it does make it more complicated. I am guessing that it is a violation of the constitution to ban felons from owning guns? By your logic, can I have a hand grenade or an RPG or a tank, fighter jet? Your ideology has blinded you. And you are just hating because you werent invited to a sexy party.
Post a Comment