Friday, June 06, 2008

"Change" I Can Believe In !

Obama "changes" every five seconds, depending on who he's talking to...

Barack Obama has strongly backed Israel in his first foreign policy speech since becoming the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee...

Speaking to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, an influential pro-Israel lobbying group, Obama said, "Any agreement with the Palestinian people must preserve Israel's identity as a Jewish state, with secure, recognized and defensible borders. Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided."

In his address, Obama also faced head-on rumors that he is a Muslim and does not support the Jewish state, calling himself a "true friend of Israel."....

Uh huh. And do you want to see how fast Obama can "change" his tune on that?

....Obama's campaign backtracked on bombshell remarks he made Wednesday that Jerusalem should remain the "undivided" capital of Israel, according to the Jerusalem Post.

An aide later softened Obama's comments - which sparked anger in the Palestinian community - saying the sides will have to negotiate "an agreement that they both can live with."

The adviser explained that by an undivided Jerusalem, Obama did not mean that it wouldn't also serve as the Palestinian capital as well. The Jewish community balked at the news.

"The Orthodox Union is extremely disappointed in this revision of Senator Obama's important statement about Jerusalem," Nathan Diament, of the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations, told the paper.

Get used to disappointment, Rabbi...me, I'd stick with Obama's "changed" view, which echos that of his anti-semetic pastor of twenty years...

Doesn't matter, and Obama is smart enough to know it. If Hitler rose from the 12th Rung of Hell from whence he dwells and captured the Democratic nomination (not terribly unlikely given the sentiments of the far-left element of the party), he would still likely capture 75% of the Jewish vote.

"What, you want me to vote for that Republican fellow? That Hitler guy, he may not be the best thing for the Jews, but he's sure right about socialized medicine and gun control...""

UPDATE: More waffling from the terrorist sympathizer -well, from his spokesman:

He refused, however, to rule out other configurations, such as the city also serving as the capital of a Palestinian state or Palestinian sovereignty over Arab neighborhoods.

I see.....

2 comments:

Erica said...

"If Hitler rose from the 12th Rung of Hell from whence he dwells and captured the Democratic nomination (not terribly unlikely given the sentiments of the far-left element of the party), he would still likely capture 75% of the Jewish vote."

That type of thinking, from Jews, People of the Book...I don't understand it, I am ashamed of it, it frustrates me, and makes me angry.

Jews are faced with the daily specter of dying violent, horrible deaths by exploding terrorists in Israel, and left-wing American Jews concern themselves more with the civil liberties of the Muslims, and cry "Racism!" when we dare to take them to task.

I think every person who does not find Islamic fundamentalism to be a problem should be forced to sit, like Alex in "A Clockwork Orange," with their eyes propped open, in a room with a screen showing all the horrible things terrorists have done to innocent people.

I cannot think of any other way to cut through the mental illness that grips these misguided souls. It is so sad that what happened on 9/11/01 wasn't enough to open their eyes.

Eliyahu m'Tsiyon said...

giving the palestinian authority control of "Arab neighborhoods" in Jerusalem is a very bad idea which I consider a personal threat to me and my family. When Jordan controlled part of Jerusalem between 1948 and 1967, troops of Jordan's Arab Legion were shooting from the walls of the Old City at Jews in the Israel controlled part of Jerusalem. We don't need a repeat of that bad experience, even if condoleezza rice wants to help the Arabs kill more Jews.