Monday, March 22, 2010

Slaughter's Constituents Throw A Brick

....I guess the residents of Fairport, New York - represented by Louise "Slaughter Rule" Slaughter - have finally realized that their tony, upscale lifestyle (it is known as "The Crown Jewel of the Erie Canal"; in 2005 it was named as one of Money Magazine's "Best Places to Live") will be torn asunder if the Democrats "socialization" of America continues apace.

So they did something about it, I guess:

NIAGARA FALLS — The "Slaughter Solution" on health care isn't the only thing that has come under attack in U.S. Rep. Louise M. Slaughter's world this week. Sometime early this morning, someone threw a brick through the front window of her Pine Avenue office.

The damage was discovered about 12:30 a.m., city police said.

The brick put a hole in the outer-most window at the office at 1910 Pine Ave., but did not damage a second interior window, police reported. A piece of broken brick believed to have caused the damage was found at the scene.

But maybe I am wrong about that; maybe the liberal elite never learn. Slaughter's district is gerrymandered in such a convoluted way that it is nicknamed "the earmuff district - check out that swath of green:


So maybe it was someone from the more depressed Buffalo area, where a factory closes every five minutes, or from Rochester, which has been in the doldrums for what seems like a decade, who chucked that brick. An unemployed factory worker, who did not want to have to pay for the next fella's health care? A retiree on pension, who does not want to see Medicaid cut? Or just an average Joe (or Joesette?) who was tired of not having their voice heard in Washington; someone whose voice is shouted out by the money waved around from the more upscale, and liberal Fairport region?

Well, I understand the anger, but let's throw the bums out, not throw the bricks in. After all, you might hurt someone - and then you have to pay for their health care...

"So This Is How Liberty Dies....

"The Republic has been re-organized...into an Empire!"



....to thunderous applause"



Nancy as the Emperor, and Obama as Darth Vader? Sounds about right...

It's the idea of America as their Empire that I can't stomach...

Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?

Hey, we're Americans - nothing is over until we say it's over!



And the health care debate hasn't even begun. Sure, Obama and the Democrats had just enough of their minions in line to vote for a socialization of America's medical system, but in doing so, they've raised the American people out of a stupor and into a rage not seen in decades. Sure, the media is completely in the government's pocket, but since nobody really pays much attention to them anymore anyway, what's the difference?

We've gained a lot more than we've lost in the short term. We realize why Democrats and liberals cannot be trusted with the levers of the state, as they will always use it to empower themselves while impoverishing the nation. We've learned (thank you, Bart Stupak!) that there is no such thing as a "pro-life Democrat", or even a "centrist" Democrat - for when the call comes from the left, they will dutifully fall into line. We learned that certain provisions of our governing bodies can be stretched to force unpopular legislation down the throat of an unwilling public, and be manipulated to allow a single party to rule tyrannically.

And we can fix this. We can start in 2010 by taking back the House, where all requests for appropriations must begin. We will deny Obama his funds, we will refuse to take up his causes, we will stop the bloody train of government tyranny in its tracks, before the bodies begin to pile up under its steel wheels. We will rewrite the rules to prevent deem-and-pass, we will reassert state's rights as affirmed in our Constitution.

We will fight back against a government that has us against the wall, and at gunpoint, is taking our money, controlling our health insurance, interfering in our personal life choices, and is bankrupting our nation.

We can win this one if we stay strong, ignore the media, and pay attention to our values. Remember - as the mainstream media celebrated the permanent Democratic majority in the weeks after the 2008 election, did any of you think that in March 2010 we would be talking about the Democratic majority being in danger?

This is not the beginning of the end. It is the end of the beginning.

It's on, bitches. Bring it.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Mayor of Seaside Arrested in Bar Brawl - Auditioning for Jersey Shore 2010?

Pity the poor cast of MTV's The Jersey Shore, derided from coast to coast. Sure, they got drunk and got into brawls at bars all across Seaside Heights, but what folks don't understand is that this behavior is not just accepted in Seaside, it is expected. It's as common as green puke on St. Patrick Day, or the burning of Detroit after a world championship.

In other words...everyone does it like that in Seaside. Including the mayor of neighboring Seaside Park, who got himself arrested by stepping in the middle of a fight between his kids, and the local cops while boozing it up at the Shore.

Classic Jersey, man:

The mayor of Seaside Park was arrested, along with his adult son and daughter, outside a nightclub in Seaside Heights, authorities said.

Mayor Thomas E. Connors was arrested with Anthony Connors, 23, and Lindsay Connors, 22, outside of Hemingway's Cafe, according to a statement released by Seaside Heights police.

Anthony Connors was being escorted from the bar by staff members, when police say he attempted to hit the staff members. Officers stopped Anthony Connors and placed him under arrest.

Police say Lindsay Connors, who began to interfere during her brother's arrest, striking a police officer on the arm and chest area, was then arrested.

As the bar's staff escorted out their father, Mayor Connors -- who had a minor injury on his face -- saw his children being taken into custody. Police say he, then, began to interfere on their behalf and was also arrested.

Anthony Connors was charged with disorderly conduct and resisting arrest. Lindsay Connors was charged with disorderly conduct, interfering with an arrest and simple assault. The mayor was charged with disorderly conduct and interfering with an arrest.


Maybe Mayor Connors was auditioning for his own reality show? For all of the whining from the politically correct, Seaside Heights saw a spike in tourism (in a down year) after the world was made aware - by Ronnie and Sammi and Snooki - of the lawless, late Roman empire-type fun that could be had down at the Shore. With Chris Christie cutting state funding for every township and leaving them on their own, these guys have to come up with some additional revenue, pronto.

Still, this is a Class C scandal in Jersey. Without the boastful bribery, death threats, missing bodies, and illegal organ transplants, it's a one-day story at best.

Ah, but the Jersey joy of drunken brawling with family, cops, and bouncers. It's awesome - I know it, Pauli D knows it, Mayor Connors knows it, and now you know it...

Bart Stupak's Deal With The Devil

So Stupak is taking an executive order - one without the power of law, one that could be rescinded, amended, or withdrawn at any time without due process, on a mere whim - as payment for his conscience. He will vote yes on ObamaCare, and thus saddle all of American with socialized medicine, now and forever.

Did anyone tell him it's a check with no funds behind it? Especially one signed by Barack Hussein Obama....

Again - maybe Lando Calrissian can teach Bart Stupak a lesson about making a deal with tyrannical leadership:

...this deal is getting worse all the time!!



Ultimately, of course, Stupak has to answer to forces larger than Pelosi and Obama. One wonders how impressed He will be with a bounced check...

Chaos at the Capitol

On the outside, anti-reform demonstrators get pumped when Congressional Republicans fly their colors:


Apparently, the Gadsden Flag was unfurled by Reps. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who is the Chief Deputy Whip, Mary Fallin (R-OK), Bill Posey (R-FL) and Geoff Davis (R-KY),who unfurled their own yellow "Don't Tread on Me" banner from a side balcony of the Capitol, adjacent to the Speaker's Lobby.

And on the inside?

Cong. Barney Frank came out to give reporters a rundown of what happened in the chamber. A man stood up and started shouting "kill the bill." According to Frank, the man was encouraged to continue by several Republican members.

The man was escorted out. Another man started in and he was escorted out as well.

Arrests:

Re: Protesters in house gallery

One of the men arrested was Bill Gunn of Wareham, MA. He was wearing an Uncle Sam t-shirt that read "foot the bill."

Wow. Fiscal responsibility. Sounds like treason to me.

See what hope and change has wrought? Loathing, anger, tyranny, and anarchy. But keep your chin up! Only three years to go...

Rep. John Tanner (D-TN) To Vote "No" on Reform

He's retiring, but is going out doing the right thing, as opposed to selling out the nation for some administration-created cush job in 2011:

“Aside from national defense, no matter is more important to the future of our country than her financial integrity...After thorough and careful review of the legislation, I am unconvinced that the long-term trend of rising health care costs is adequately addressed and am therefore unable to support the legislation.”

Live as a Blue Dog, die as a Blue Dog. Good for Tanner....

The scoreboard, as time begins to run out:

Ayes: 211
Nays: 212
Undecided: 6

Gulp...

Stupak Folds, Paves Way For Socialized Medicine...

...according to The Corner, which has a pretty good record of getting these things right.

Stupak is selling his principles for an executive order (tentative draft here) that would forbid federal dollars paying for abortions except in cases where a life is threatened.

How solid is it? Well, an executive order does not have the force of law. And it can be overturned, 15 minutes later, by another executive order.

And the fact that the 40-odd pro-abortion activists who were screaming their heads off last night are suddenly silent ought to tell you everything you need to know about the force of this final deal.

You can bet we'll have socialized medicine by midnight. And you can be assured that taxpayer monies will be paying for elective abortions as well.

May God have mercy on us all...

UPDATE: Stupak should watch this

Wavering Dems To Vote "No" And GTFO of DC?

Looks like the few remaining fence-sitters are looking for an exit strategy...literally:

A Democrat who has long committed to opposing healthcare reform legislation has advised his fellow defectors that they should vote no early on Sunday and then immediately leave the House chamber.

Otherwise, Rep. Gene Taylor (D-Miss.) told The Hill, they will be treated "like a piƱata."

It is unclear if Democratic leaders will attempt to keep defectors from going home after they cast their vote...

Imagine - elected Democrats, in fear of their own leadership, needing to flee like heretics from their own kind.

Parker Griffith, Democrat-turned-Republican,
tells a similar story:

"These are good people and they're being pressured unmercifully right now," he continued. "I saw it on the floor 20 minutes ago before I walked into this studio. I could see it on their faces. These are people I've known over a year and it's unfortunate, it's unfair. And what's unfair about it is Obama doesn't hardly know their name. Nancy Pelosi doesn't hardly know their name. They're good for a vote and once they cast that vote it's will you love me tomorrow and the answer is no."

But Jennifer Rubin feels no sympathy:

If they can’t stand up to their own leaders or avoid the lure of plum jobs should they lose in November, this is no cause for sympathy. It’s reason for contempt. It’s one thing to vote for a monstrous bill because you actually believe it virtuous. It’s another, however, to vote for it anyway, knowing the harm it may do but supporting it regardless because you couldn’t tell Nancy Pelosi to take a hike.


I agree with Jen. Democrats who switch from "no" to "yes" at the last minute in order to guarantee the passage of this monstrous bill, in exchange for a few pieces of silver, are no more than modern-day Judases; betraying the people who trusted them, and the principles they live by, in order for some short-term gain for themselves. Are there truly no men of moral courage left in the Democratic Party?

Vote no, and flee for your lives, if you must. If you need a place to hole up, I've got a guestroom and a finished basement where you can hide out until the heat dies down...

Saturday, March 20, 2010

Glenn Nye Says "No" To Health Care Reform

A first-term Democrat in Virginia, a state that briefly went purple but is now red with rage? Really, what else could he do?

U.S. Rep. Glenn Nye announced Saturday night he is voting against against the Democratic health care bill Sunday, saying it doesn’t do enough to lower the cost of health care, would make deep cuts in some hospital funding and could cause problems for TRICARE recipients....

...participants in the military’s Tricare health plan may be subject to some health care provisions, under the latest version of the bill. Under previous versions, Tricare patients were exempt.

“ I am not willing to risk negative consequences for our military personnel and their families, particularly at a time when our troops are serving overseas in harm’s way,” Nye said.


Seems as if Democratic representatives are finally reading the bill, less so to actually understand what they are voting for, and more so as a frantic attempt to find something, anything, that can give them cover for not voting for ObamaCare. Nye found the military angle, a factor in his district, and thus an exit from the burning wreckage that is this bill...

Not exactly a profile in courage. Still, when in a foxhole during a firefight, I'll take such allies as I can get...

We Are All Lando Calrissian Now !

We were seduced into cutting a deal with the devil, convinced he was a man of his word, and that Hope and Change meant whatever we imagined it to be.

And once the deal was struck, and we held up our end of the bargain, we realized that the man we empowered really wasn't that interested in holding up his end of the deal, and he had a completely different idea of what "hope and change" was.

And when we complain about the deal, Lord Vader - sorry, I mean, Barack Obama - gives us the back of his hand, a sneer, and tells us the deal is whatever he says it is, depending on what serves his interests at any given moment.

Man, this deal is getting worse all the time....





And what's in that health care bill? You don't need to know, it's whatever I say it is, and whatever will get me what I want, regardless of what you, the people, want.

What's that ? You don't like the deal? Pray I don't alter in any further....



Inspired by The Geek With A .45 ...

Friday, March 19, 2010

Cao and Shuler: Two More "No's" on ObamaCare! UPDATE: Teague To Vote No!

First, the Democrat:

Rep. Heath Shuler (D-11th District) will vote against the President's Health Care Reform plan.

With two days to go until the vote, Rep. Shuler was one of several undecided democrats the White House and Congressional leaders were trying to sway in their favor.

Rep. Shuler just released the following statement:

"I recognize that there are strong views on both sides of the health care debate and it has spurred strong emotions throughout the nation....There is no question that our current health care system is broken and that we need to make significant reforms to improve it in an equitable, fiscally responsible and sustainable manner. In my opinion the bill as written does not meet those criteria.”

And the lone Republican who voted for the bill the first time seems to have reconsidered:

Rep. Joseph Cao (R-La.) is a "firm 'no'" on Democrats' healthcare bill, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) stressed Friday.

Cantor, the GOP's chief vote-counter in the House, said that the first-term Louisiana Republican would oppose healthcare legislation after having voted with Democrats last fall, the only Republican lawmaker to do so.

"Yes, I have spoken to Joseph Cao as recently as an hour and a half ago," Cantor said in response to a question on whether Cao would oppose the bill.

"He is a firm 'no' against this bill," Cantor added.

And yet, whenever I go to my Yahoo home page, this is the featured headline:

End in sight, health care battle tilts Obama's way

....the long, turbulent struggle over landmark health care legislation tilted unmistakably in President Barack Obama's direction.

Really? Wishing something to be so isn't the same as it actually being so, dubious CBO accounting notwithstanding. Or is the AP/Yahoo trying to create a sense of inevitability? Perhaps too, trying to beat us down, trying to convince us our "long, turbulent struggle" is now hopeless, and it is time to give in and join the winning team?

Second-tier propaganda from the media. Like Tokyo Rose without the pop music!



Give up, silly Americans! You have lost the battle against health care reform, and while you were out protesting, your girlfriend was cheating on you with ! Give up, give in, and join us as we march together under the banner of The One...!

UPDATE: Teague To Vote No; Pelosi’s Margin Now Zero

Harry Teague of New Mexico will vote no.

"I had hoped to have a chance to vote on a bill that provided affordable health care options to all American families, but after reviewing the final health care reform proposal, I do not believe that the bill does enough to contain costs and it definitely does not do enough to rein in the out of control insurance companies that are driving up healthcare costs in this country. In fact, I believe we are doing more for the insurance companies than we are for the people who need this coverage, and that is why, despite the positive steps it takes, I must vote against this bill "

Maybe the long, turbulant struggle is almost over after all...

Democrats Call Bullshit On Their Own CBO Score

From a leaked memo circulating within the Democratic party, strict orders not to to discuss the CBO score, lest the truth interfere with their hand-picked narrative:

We cannot emphasize enough: do not allow yourself (or your boss) to get into a discussion of the details of the CBO scores and textual narrative. Instead, focus only on the deficit reduction and number of Americans covered. There are two CBO letters Republican operatives have already begun distorting in their pursuit of killing our reform efforts: 1) CBO's March 11, 2010 letter to Leader Reid analyzing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as passed by.the Senate, and 2} CBO's letter to Leader Reid (November 18, 2009) with the initial score of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
I list these letters only to warn you of coming attscks from right-wing operatives and Republican sympathizers in the media. Those anti-reform extremists are making a last-ditch effort to derail reform. Do not give them ground by debating details. (For example, the March 11 letter has estimates of discretionary costs not accounted in the total). Again, instead focus only on the deficit reduction and number of Americans covered. In the critical remaining hours of debate we must drive the narrative of "health reform is deficit reduction."

Too bad no one, not even the house whores of the Party, the New York Times and the Washington Post, are buying this line of shit...first, the WaPo:

Congressional Budget Office's sunny forecast carries big uncertainties

....although the forecasts that accompany legislation are always filled with uncertainty, this one contains more than most...One major reason is the sheer complexity of the legislation....the proposal on the table contains sweeping changes that would touch almost all corners of the health-care system, and the changes interrelate in hard-to-predict ways....

The estimates assume that the legislation plays out as written over the coming decade, which would mean reining in the growth of payments to doctors and hospitals and implementing a tax on high-cost health insurance plans....

Fat freakin' chance. The Times seems more critical of the process (take that, Nancy!), than the legislation, which they admit was based less on pinpoint reform goals and more on pinpoint dollar goals:

Love it or hate it, one thing that is indisputable about the Democrats’ big health care legislation is that the cost figures are going to come out right where President Obama said he wanted them.

....the overall numbers were never going to miss the mark. Whenever the budget office judged that some element or elements of the bill would cause a problem meeting the cost and deficit-reduction targets, Democrats just adjusted the underlying legislation to make sure it would hit their goal.

Back to the leaked memo up top, here's where the Democrats admit that they will never pass the "doc fix" (cutting payments to doctors - now that's a great way to insure quality medical care!) needed to make the bill cost "only" a trillion or so:

Most health staff are already aware that our health proposal does not contain a “doc fix.” Some Republicans have repeated CBO’s November 18 letter that says “the sustainable growth rate (SGR) mechanism governing Medicare’s payments to physicians has frequently been modified (either through legislation or administrative action) to avoid reductions in those payments, and legislation to do so again is currently under consideration in Congress.” The inclusion of a full SGR repeal would undermine reform’s budget neutrality.

. . .As most health staff knows, Leadership and the White House are working with the AMA to rally physicians support for a full SGR repeal later this spring. However, both health and communications staff should understand we do not want that policy discussed at this time, lest it complicate the last critical push to pass health reform.

The Democrats know their bill is bullshit; they just need to sell it to themselves for a few more days, and the nationalization of American medicine, the best in the world, is complete. The media knows the cost is exponentially higher than what the public is being told, but they report on it through a silk hankie, so as not to offend the editorial board or their masters in the Democratic party (so much for that whole "truth to power" thing...).

And now we know it's bullshit. Angry yet?

Obama Manages To Piss Off Canada, Too....

....now that is a remarkable feat! Our northern neighbors are some of the friendliest and docile folk in the hemisphere (unless you're bringing up hockey or the relative quality of American beer), and yet Barack Obama has somehow managed to get under their skin as well.

We have been officially warned, by the Canadian ambassador, to get off our global-warming high horse, or get our oil elsewhere:

“The United States should not discriminate against the Canadian oil sands industry. "Ultimately if the United States becomes less open to oil sands, Doer said the fuel can go elsewhere...."

"This is a commodity that can sold somewhere else. It's not as if the United States is the only country interested in purchasing oil,"
~ Canadian Ambassador Gary Doer

As mentioned, the root of the Canadian ire is the Democrats insistence that we adhere to the cult of global warming:

Canada's abundant oil sands resources have been threatened in the U.S. market with proposed climate change policies that would place additional costs on fuels that emit higher levels of carbon dioxide.

Way to go, Baracky. So when you're done raping Israel, screwing Europe, blowing the mullahs of Iran, and giving the Canadians the finger, maybe you can come out to Jersey and sodomize my grandmother?

I mean, really...what the hell is next with this guy?

Obama Strips Israel Naked; Ties Her To A Tree...

...and sits back and waits for the animals to attack:

The United States has diverted a shipment of bunker-busters designated for Israel... Officials said the U.S. military was ordered to divert a shipment of smart bunker-buster bombs from Israel to a military base in Diego Garcia.

Since taking office, Obama has refused to approve any major Israeli requests for U.S. weapons platforms or advanced systems. Officials said this included proposed Israeli procurement of AH-64D Apache attack helicopters , refueling systems, advanced munitions and data on a stealth variant of the F-15E.

"All signs indicate that this will continue in 2010," a congressional source familiar with the Israeli military requests said. "This is really an embargo, but nobody talks about it publicly."

Obama, trying to live the Muslim dream of forcing Israel to her knees and begging for her life. Stripping her of her defenses, leading the charge of her enemies, Obama wants to vest the power of Israel's life into his hands, so that he may grant it to her, but with the caveat that she must live as he so dictates.

And when I say beg:

President Obama ...has not committed to any meetings with Israeli leaders who are scheduled to be in Washington next week and are perhaps hoping to repair what many observers are calling a mis-step between the U.S. and Israel...

Not until they are on their knees before him. Barack Hussein Obama, doing what all the Arab kings, mullahs, and chairmen have failed to do: Bend the Jewish state to his will. Oh, how the Muslim populations will swoon before him, the natural leader of the new caliphate...

We've elected more than just an ideologue, folks. We've elected an anti-Semitic megalomaniac, and given him the most powerful army in the history of civilization.

If there's a God, I hope he's awake right now, and paying attention...

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Saul Alinksy Defines "Reconciliation"...

...exactly the way Barack Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi define it - from his epic "Rules for Radicals:

It is a world not of angels but of angles, where men speak of moral principles but act on power principles; a world where we are always moral and our enemies always immoral; a world where “reconciliation” means that when one side gets the power and the other side gets reconciled to it, then we have reconciliation...

They run things now. We just work for them. So keep you heads down, slave away, and if you're lucky they'll leave you with just enough to survive.

Reconcile yourself to it.

The Cost Of Health Care Reform: $160 Billion A Year, Forever...

....well, that's not exactly true. Like all entitlement programs, the cost will keep escalating and escalating...

The CBO released a "preliminary" report on what the first ten years of health care reform would cost: $940 billion, with $923 billion coming in the last six years. Why? Because while the collection of taxes will begin tomorrow, the benefits won't start for another four years. So even with paying ten years of fees to get only six years of service (a scam that only the government could get away with), it will cost nearly a trillion dollars. Assuming that costs remain flat (!), that comes to $2.5 trillion over 20 years.

How are we gonna pay for that? Even the so-called "deficit-reducing" aspect of reform, which has savings estimated in the same preliminary CBO report as $138 billion, is nothing but spit in the black hole of deficits Obama is creating. With current forecasts estimating fedeeral deficits of $1.9 trillion within the decade, socialized medicine reduces Obama's insanely bloated deficit by only 7%. And that is the best-case scenario....

But here's the kicker: Insiders say that final CBO scores, replacing today's preliminary estimates, will be released late Saturday or Sunday.

Just after the bill is passed. But before Americans have a chance to read it. We will have been duped, but the snake-oil salesmen will have fled town, leaving us with a big pile of sh*t on our hands, now and forever. Meanwhile, Obama and Pelosi will be French-kissing while the media looks on and masturbates furiously...

Welcome to the Occupation...

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

New Jersey: Abortion Advocates Up In Arms!

Why? Because Governor Christie, in trying to close a $10 billion budget gap, is reducing funding for Planned Parenthood and associated organizations. Their spokeswoman flew into a frothing liberal frenzy at the news, and perhaps said a little more than she ought to...let's listen to Michele Jaker, executive director Family Planning Association of New Jersey (and the Vice-Chair of the Woodbridge Democratic Organization, of course):

Each public dollar spent to provide family planning services saves an estimated $4 that would otherwise be spent in Medicaid-related costs alone.

“The best way to prevent unintended pregnancies and promote healthy families is to invest in family planning, and ensure that women and families have access to affordable, quality reproductive health care” said Jaker. “Instead, Governor Christie wants to completely eliminate critical funds that reduce the number of unintended pregnancies. "

I am a bit confused about the point Jaker is trying to make here. Even in purple Jersey, her argument/scare tactic here that she will be able to perform less abortions under the new budget might not carry much weight with the voters.

What's interesting is that state funds, by law, cannot pay for abortions. So if Jaker is being honest here about having less ability to abort babies, it means that Planned Parenthood of New Jersey has been slushing taxpayer funds around a bit in order to fund its abortion operation. Why else would a budget cut affect Planned Parenthood's ability to perform its surgical "family planning" procedures?

Funny too, how Jaker makes the assumption that abortions are part and parcel of having a "healthy family". I am not sure most New Jersey residents would accept Jaker's definition of a "healthy family"; unless they fall into the hardcore leftist camp that Jaker seems to hold senior membership in. Incidentally, I wonder how many abortions preformed under Jaker were done on black/minority families? Seems like Jaker may be a one-woman holocaust working to wipe out the next generation of nonwhite New Jerseyans...

Finally, I find Jaker's first sentence to be the most disturbing. Each $1 not spend on abortion (I'm sorry, "family planning services") costs the government $4- later on? She can't be advocating generational genocide, can she? That having less citizens is more cost-effective and thus more desirable to the state? Is this silent, unspoken part of the liberal agenda now official government policy?

Well, under an occupation, the ruling power does want to strictly limit the size of the native class...makes it easier for them to dictate with an iron fist...

The United States 2010: Life Under The Occupation

May you live in interesting times, goes the Chinese curse, and are these days and nights interesting indeed. When a government no longer has the consent of the governed, said government is no longer acting with legal authority (or so says the Declaration, anyway - silly white men, what did they know?). And when the government continues to act by decree, and infringe upon the freedoms of its citizens, confiscate their income, and wage war unilaterally...that's tyranny.

Welcome to America, 2010. And you wonder why it feels as if we are being occupied by a foreign power? Look at the actions of those who have seized control of the state:

-the looting the national treasury, to the tune of $787 billion (plus interest), in the name of "stimulus". Monies were spent almost entirely on pet liberal projects and on funding to keep government functionaries employed. This will need to be paid back by the private sector, via taxation.

-a complete takeover of the economy, via the EPA's claim that "carbon dioxide" (yes, the air you exhale) is a "greenhouse gas" that must be regulated. Since most businesses to some extent or another emit CO2, the entirety of the world's largest economy is now, without vote or law, under the purview of the executive branch of the government. It's command-and-control, Soviet-style. Anyone remember how well that worked out?

-elimination of control & choice over your body via the nationalization of the health care system (also, apparently, via fiat). Costs will skyrocket, resources will become scarce, and the quality and quantity of care will drop for everyone. Eventually, the nation will be forced into a British or Canadian-style "NHS", where bureaucrats will decide who will live and who will die by the rationing of care and medication that is already de rigor in these two nations. This will also give the government opportunity to regulate much of your eating/drinking habits, since your individuality is now lost in morass of "what's best for 'the people'". Not to mention that the government now fully intends to start funding abortion - the killing of humans - under the guise of "national health" as well.

-indoctrination of children. Attached to the health care bill is a rider that will nationalize the student loan industry, and make the government the sole provider of said loans. Thus, the affordability of college will no longer be up to parents, or local bankers - it will be up to the government. So you'd better play ball. After all, the president has signed legislation increasing Americorps to 250,000 "volunteers" - so if your kid wants to go to school, he'd better put on the brownshirt and work for Obama first...

-Obama has unleashed war upon the Israelis for refusing to cede their sovereign territories to a hostile power. He forced a regional crisis in Central America when he threw his support behind a leftist thug who was legally ousted from the Honduran government. He has reneged on deals to protect our European allies with missile defense. And he is allowing the Iranians to build nukes with impunity, even as they promise to use them to create a Second Holocaust. All positions anathema to the American population. None of which bothers Obama and the Democrats a bit.

-even our cherished national symbols are being desecrated, as the army is ordered not to fly the American flag...

Limiting freedoms. Loss of control of daily decisions. Children forced to serve the leadership. Monies extorted from the citizenry. National symbols eliminated. Businesses controlled. Populations "aborted". Treasure looted. Legislative processes ignored and mocked.

Welcome to the Occupation of America.

So what does that pesky Declaration say about this? Oh, yeah:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness....

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Obama Ignites War In The Middle East

So this is smart diplomacy? Even an amateur could tell you that once abandoned by its strongest ally, Israel would come under assault from enemies smelling weakness, and opportunity. And by golly, did Obama provide it to them with his no-holds-barred Sunday hatefest played out by his minions on national TV.

The bloodshed begins:

Palestinians mounted violent protests in Jerusalem on Tuesday and President Barack Obama's Middle East envoy canceled plans to return to the region as a U.S.-Israeli crisis over Jewish settlement plans deepened.
Hundreds of rock-throwing Palestinians clashed with police in several locations in East Jerusalem... Police responded with teargas and rubber bullets.


"There is an explosive situation. There are Netanyahu's policies, which are tantamount to pouring oil on fire," said Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat.

Hamas, an Islamist group that controls the Gaza Strip, said in a statement that Palestinians should "regard Tuesday as a day of rage against the occupation's (Israel's) procedures in Jerusalem against al-Aqsa mosque".

Make no doubt about it. The blood of the dead in the upcoming conflict - and I fear this is only the beginning - will be squarely on Barack Obama's hands, for abandoning Israel in the face of her enemies.

And be assured, this is the opening Obama has been waiting for, to finally abandon Israel to the Islamic wolves. He will demand Israeli "restraint" in the face of the upcoming assault, and when they defend their lives, he will condemn them, and lead the march to Turtle Bay, where he will betray them before the United Nations, where finally, after 65 years, the rabid dogs of anti-Semitism will be free to run wild again.

Is Obama the freaking AntiChrist, or what?

The Antichrist will spend many years working silently behind the scenes to consolidate his power...When his time comes he will take advantage of the political situation in a country to rise to power. It will not matter that he is not a native of the country. He will take advantage of loopholes and contrive positions...The Antichrist will foment rebellions within the countries he's aiming to take over...Because of his Middle Eastern heritage he will have already united North Africans, who are sympathetic to his cultural background, with his Asian and Middle Eastern conglomerate.

Hey, I didn't say it...Nostradamus did...