"The Istanbul Process": The Islamification of America?

Islamification has been used to describe the process of a society's conversion to the religion of Islam. In contemporary usage, it may refer to the perceived imposition of an Islamist social and political discourse on a society with a tradition of a more varied interpretation of Islam...

Well, when you elect a president named Barack Hussein Obama...

The brainchild of Hillary Clinton, and hosted by the State Department, "The Instanbul Process" is, on its surface, supposed to be a mere gabfest about the alleged pervasiveness of so-called "Islamaphobia". The fact that the conference is closed to the public gives you an indication of how badly the Obama Administration wants to hide what it is up to.

Nina Shea, by dint of being a commissioner on the independent U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, did get an invite to the confab. And although she is not allowed to quote for attribution, she can certainly speak in generalities.

Which she does, but it ain't too hard to connect these dots.

Legal and security officials of a delegation which will remain unnamed gave a sweeping overview of American founding principles on religious freedom and how they have been breached time and again in American history by attacks against a broad variety of religious minority groups — including now against Muslims. A raft of current cases were mentioned; America’s relative exemplary and distinctive achievement in upholding religious freedom in an emphatically pluralistic society was not. That same speaker reassured the audience, which was packed with diplomats from around the world, that the Obama administration is working diligently to prosecute American Islamophobes and is transforming the U.S. Justice Department into the conscience of the nation, though it could no doubt learn a thing or two from the assembled delegates on other ways to stop persistent religious intolerance in America.

Across the room, smirking delegates from some of the world’s most repressive and intolerant regimes could be spotted, furiously taking notes...

Let's go back to what Hillary Clinton said in back in July, when she announced the creation of the Istanbul Process:

In the United States, I will admit, there are people who still feel vulnerable or marginalized as a result of their religious beliefs. And we have seen how the incendiary actions of just a very few people, a handful in a country of nearly 300 million, can create wide ripples of intolerance.

....freedom of expression has been a universal right at the core of our democracy. So we are focused on promoting interfaith education and collaboration, enforcing antidiscrimination laws, protecting the rights of all people to worship as they choose, and to use some old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming, so that people don't feel that they have the support to do what we abhor.

It matches, almost word for word, for what Shea claims is being said during "The Process" meetings. Although Hillary doesn't seem to get the intellectual disconnect between bragging about American's right of free expression, and promising moments later to use the full force of the United States government to crack down on the ability of Americans to enjoy that right. At least when it comes to talking about Muslims....

Or maybe she does. Remember, this is how the European leadership forced massive Muslim immigration down the throats of their populace - by shaming them into silence. Come to think of it, it's the same way the left got Barack Hussein Obama elected - by branding his critics as racist, and demanding apologies for the use of his middle name.

The Istanbul Process is the final sell-out of the American people to radical Islam. Are they in fear of it, and hoping to buy at least five minutes of peace, or even just their own lives? Or, is it again, a more..."European" drive?

Andrew Neather — a former adviser to Jack Straw, Tony Blair and David Blunkett — claimed that Labour ministers had a hidden agenda in allowing mass immigration into Britain, to "change the face of Britain forever". This alleged conspiracy has become known by the sobriquet "Neathergate".

According to Neather, who was present at closed meetings in 2000, a secret Government report called for mass immigration to change Britain's cultural make-up, and that “mass immigration was the way that the government was going to make the UK truly multicultural”.  Neather went on to say that “the policy was intended — even if this wasn’t its main purpose — to rub the right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date”

This was later affirmed after a request through the freedom of information act secured access to the full version of a 2000 government report on immigration that had been heavily edited on a previous release....

I'll bet on the latter. It's an Administration of traitors, with Obama, Hillary, and Holder selling our entire history and tradition, for hate's sake.  Their hatred of their fellow Americans....