Now Writing for al-Qaida...

...The New York Times! Yes, the number one terrorist mouthpiece in print (CNN ties with al-Jazerra for televised terrorist propoganda) pushes the enemy's agenda thoroughly in today's Sunday edition. Let's look at a few:

Defying U.S. Efforts, Guerrillas in Iraq Refocus and Strengthen
They just keep getting stronger.
Despite months of assurances that their forces were on the wane, the guerrillas and terrorists battling the American-backed enterprise here appear to be growing more violent, more resilient and more sophisticated than ever.
-well, I certainly see how the Times could percieve it that way; since they never run a positive story about American military victories or heroic deeds by soldiers (no such thing as an American hero to the Times, unless they are American-bashing)

If It's Civil War, Do We Know It?
The past 10 days have seen such a quickening of these killings, particularly by the insurgents, that many Iraqis are saying that the civil war has already begun.
- if one side is perpetrating mass homicides, and the other side fights back, do we then have a civil war? Or would the Times prefer a slaughter?

British Promise to Investigate Killing of Brazilian in Subway
British police officers gunned down the Brazilian man at point-blank range in front of horrified subway passengers on Friday, after apparently attracting attention because he left a building that was under surveillance and because he was wearing a heavy coat in warm weather.
-...and didn't stop after numerous requests by the police chasing him. Note how quickly the Times works to change the subject away from the attacks on London to find fault with the West.

And don't forget to keep bashing the Commander-in-Chief!

Eight Days in July
The agenda of President Bush's rushed Supreme Court nomination - to change the subject in Washington - could not have been more naked
-jeez; and I thought he nominated a Supreme Court Justice because there was a vacancy on the Court!

For Bush, Effect of Investigation of C.I.A. Leak Case Is Uncertain
...For all that, it is still not clear what the investigation into the leak of a C.I.A. operative's identity will mean for President Bush.
-so the article essentially admits this probably will amount to nothing, but it gives our friends at the Times yet another opportunity to engage in anti-Bush rhetoric and innuendo...

Bravo, New York Times! You have served your terrorist masters well; Osama must be very pleased with your service to him....

No links; I feel dirty enough as it is...