5,5500 words. The approximate length of the piece claiming Mitt Romney was involved in a nasty piece of bullying in high school. After that amount of time, that amount of work, the piece should be virtually unassailable.
Turns out in this case, it isn't even true:
Ashley Parker of the New York Times has a statement from the family of John Lauber, the man the Washington Post claimed Mitt Romney bullied in high school. She tweets:
From John Lauber’s family, the bullied victim in WaPo story: “We are aggrieved that John would be used to further a political agenda.”
Also from John Lauber’s family: “The portrayal of John is factually incorrect,” but they would not elaborate on how it was inaccurate.
This comes after one source for the story, a man the Washington Post says has “long been bothered” by the incident, said he wasn’t even present and had no idea it had happened until the Post contacted him.
Unfortunately - or fortunately for the Washington Post - Mr. Lauber is dead, and unable to tell us what really happened that day - if anything. Via Breitbart, it seems as if the most damaging quotes were taken - intentionally - out of context:
The original Washington Post piece stated the following:
“I always enjoyed his pranks,” said Stu White, a popular friend of Romney’s who went on to a career as a public school teacher and has long been bothered by the Lauber incident.
Yet in an interview with ABC News today, White disowned that characterization:
While the Post reports White as having “long been bothered” by the haircutting incident,” he told ABC News he was not present for the prank, in which Romney is said to have forcefully cut a student’s long hair and was not aware of it until this year when he was contacted by the Washington Post.
Read it all, apparently, once busted, the WaPo re-wrote this portion of their fairy tale without mentioning it had made a key correction to the piece.
To paraphrase Mary McCarthy's famous line about Lillian Hellman, every word they write is a lie, including and and the...
What's the worst part about this for the Washington Post? Well, they've created sympathy for Mitt Romney with such a blatantly false hit-piece. Bad enough, I suppose. But their ham-fisted stupidity has opened the doors for Republicans to go back to Barack Obama's early years to see how he treated his mates.
Turns out, by his own admission, the president is even more a bully than the WaPo claims Romney was. You see, Obama confesses to pushing around...little girls. From the autobiography that everyone loved but nobody read:
Who knows, maybe the puppy he just ate for lunch upset his stomach a bit, and he took it out on poor little Coretta...
3 comments:
Lauber's family only said the portrayal of John was factually inaccurate. They said he was a boarder, not a day student. Lauber died in 2004 and his family became very upset when they learned of this incident from the media. They certainly did not deny that the incident occurred.
There's a big difference between Mitt Romney and President Obama. Obama's reflection upon the incident with little Coretta shows a grown man's compassion and remorse over childhood behavior. Obama remembers it, and it bothered him enough to write about it. Romney, not so much.
Odd that apparently Romney nor one of the key "witnesses" can even recall this story. Dan Rather & the "National Guard memo" all over again. Is this the best the Left has got?
Weak, man. Real weak.
Of course the witnesses recall the incident. That's how the story got out. It's Romney who can't recall it -- which says a lot about Romney. As for the National Guard memo -- you should educate yourself about that story. And is this the best the Left has got? Nope. Just wait.
Post a Comment