Accomodating Genocide, Aiding Fascism

It is long past time that Western nations of democratic foundations and good conscious leave the United Nations. This fetid organization has been compromised by its darkest elements and has been subverted to work their will. Terrorist nations form the backbone of its "Human Rights" panels, efforts to halt genocide are thwarted by those who would profit from its completion, and resolutions aimed at improving upon Hitler's "final solution" are introduced on a daily basis.

Two items to illustrate the evil that the UN perpetuates - first, from today's Washington Post:

In the face of ongoing genocide in Darfur, the international community's failure to accept the "responsibility to protect" (that's United Nations language, officially adopted) innocent civilian lives has taken its last, abject form. The National Islamic Front (NIF) regime in Khartoum, made up of the very men who have for more than three years orchestrated the systematic destruction of Darfur's African tribal populations, has been told directly and unambiguously that there will be no U.N. peacemaking force without its consent.

In the revealing words of British U.N. Ambassador Emyr Jones Parry, Khartoum's agreement to U.N. deployment "is quite crucial" to taking any meaningful action....

In short, the international community has conferred upon the genocidaires the power to veto deployment of the very force that might halt an accelerating slide toward catastrophic human destruction.

Imagine the result if the National Socialist Party of Germany had to be asked permission before German Jews could be protected. Well, we see it now in Darfur, where the regime in Khartoum has been given a green light to slaugher its way through the population until their program of ethnic cleansing is complete. Maybe then the UN will issue a strongly worded letter of disapproval...

But what if one wanted to fight back against their oppressors, whether it be the genociders listed above, or Israel finally having enough of being shelled by Hezbollah, or even the United states disabling the regime in Afghanistan that launched the attacks on 9/11? Well, can you believe the UN has found that the right to survive is not found in "international law" (whatever in hell that is)? You see, the UN must not only give a free hand to genocidal maniacs, it now additionally serves to tie the hands of those whom would fight back...from Arms and the Law:

[From] A report (pdf format) submitted by Barbara Frey, Special Rapporteur, whatever that is, to the UN Human Rights Councils's Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, whatever that is....

"20. Self-defence is a widely recognized, yet legally proscribed, exception to the universal duty to respect the right to life of others. Self-defence is a basis for exemption from criminal responsibility that can be raised by any State agent or non-State actor. Self-defence is sometimes designated as a “right”. There is inadequate legal support for such an interpretation. Self-defence is more properly characterized as a means of protecting the right to life and, as such, a basis for avoiding responsibility for violating the rights of another.

21. No international human right of self-defence is expressly set forth in the primary sources of international law: treaties, customary law, or general principles.

So to defend yourself from an attack by a foreign nation (or individual militias, terrorist organizations, etc.) can cause you to run afoul of the UN's interpetation of international law. In fact, if I understand the above correctly, the brave Americans who retook Flight 93 on 9/11 and prevented another mass slaughter actually violated the civil rights of the Islamic fascists who had hijacked it in the first place!

Via this unintelligable game of moral twister, the UN has effectively tied the hands of anyone who might want to fight the rising tide of fascism in our world today - Israel is guilty for fighting back against Hezbollah and Hamas, the US is guilty for fighting back against al-Qaeda, and in the case of Iran, no sanctions can be placed without the permission of other terrorist nations and any preemptive attack against this country publicly gearing up for a self-declared second Holocaust would be a violation of their human rights as well.

Quite subtly, and not without purpose, the UN has cleared the way for evil to survive, grow, and flourish, while making any attempt to stop it a crime. Heads we lose, tails we lose, as the enemies of civilization walk through the dark halls of the United Nations laughing and flipping their two-headed coin....

But the only crime, as I stated at the outset, is for nations of honest values and good conscious to act in the name of this hateful organization.

Let us leave its rotting corpse to those whom live on carrion, and let the world's democratic nations form a new organization, where leaders freely elected by their peoples can form a common security and empower the values of personal liberty. Yes, it may push some adversarial situations into the open, but what is the choice? To endorse Iran's nuclear program? To allow the genocide in Darfur? To vote for the elimination of Israel? To turn our value system so upside-down that it becomes Orwellian, and otherwise inapplicable? Here, on the 67th anniversary of WWII, are we setting the table to allow the monsters to feed again?

No. Best to leave the United Nations now, before we catch their sickening disease...