tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11677794.post6562408214902043512..comments2024-03-20T08:04:12.851-04:00Comments on Right, Wing-Nut!: Moral EquivalenceThe JerseyNuthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03294235408620262661noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11677794.post-8116731906437012902007-06-28T00:33:00.000-04:002007-06-28T00:33:00.000-04:00Our prez is doing the same... it's called "not wan...Our prez is doing the same... it's called "not wanting to seem Islamaphobic, which is what the leftists love to call anyone who is critical of Islam. It's the PC thing to do.Incognitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09692949516037191969noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11677794.post-12622363032754331622007-06-27T20:35:00.000-04:002007-06-27T20:35:00.000-04:00"Interesting that Obama chooses to compare the lea...<I>"Interesting that Obama chooses to compare the leaders of the Christian Right - a group trying to get their views represented via the ballot box - to the leaders of the Islamist movement, a group trying to get their views enforced by the worldwide slaughter of the innocent. Are they morally equivalent in his eyes?"</I><BR/><BR/>I would say no, not morally equivalent.<BR/><BR/><B>Factually</B> equivalent.<BR/><BR/>Both want to gain the power of government, by whatever means available.<BR/><BR/>Both want to impose <B>their </B> interpretation of religion, law and morality upon their nation.<BR/><BR/>Both want to exclude the practice of other religions through the creation of monotheistic States.<BR/><BR/>Both want the restrictive views of their particular interpretation of religion, science and society taught to children as "truth".<BR/><BR/>That is not moral equivalence. That is direct application of fact.The probligohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17882103150181414348noreply@blogger.com